|

Within
a few days of September 11, 2001, now Majority Whip, U.S. Congressman Roy
Blunt, stated publically at a 911 gathering near Springfield, Mo. that
everything had happened just as “we practiced it”. Does the June, 2001 planning by NORAD also explain why his
son, Mo. Secretary of State, Matt Blunt (Roy Jr., candidate for Mo. Governor
2004) was thought by his staff to be at the Pentagon the morning of 911? And does the information below regarding securities
and stock trading in anyway relate to the fact Matt Blunt is also over
securities for the State of Missouri or the fact he abandoned his post as Mo.
Secretary of State (although he continued to be paid illegally for the work)
shortly after 911 and spent six months with the British Navy in the United
Kingdom?
Is
it not true, that a deal has already been cut where so called Democrat, but
really another British trained Republican operative with Green Party leanings
and connections, Jason Klumb, has been promised he can be Mo. Treasurer
(since Matt Blunt certifies the votes) while Blunt promotes himself to
governor, Kinder as lt. governor, and Hannaway as secretary of state? Goodness, this may be the year when the
Republicans even oust Jay Nixon as Mo. Attorney General or is the prelude of
power shuffle in the Mo. courts over gay marriage just a warning to Nixon
from the Blunt-Bush-Ashcroft-UK regime?
Source---http://www.cooperativeresearch.org Portions of Complete Timeline online
|
|
|
|
|

|
A multi-agency planning exercise sponsored by NORAD (the
North American Aerospace Defense Command, in charge of defending US
airspace) involves the hypothetical scenario of a cruise missile launched
by “a rogue (government) or somebody” from a barge off the East Coast. Bin
Laden is pictured on the cover of the proposal for the exercise. [American Forces Press
Service 6/4/02] After 9/11, the government claims that this type
of an attack was completely unexpected, and as a result it had only 14
fighters on standby to defend the entire US. [Newsday 9/23/01]
|
|
|
September 11, 2001 6:30 a.m. Cheyenne, Wyoming
Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins and other NORAD employees at NEADS
(NORAD's Northeast Air Defense Sector that covers the Washington and New York
areas) are starting their work day. NORAD is unusually prepared on 9/11,
because it is conducting a week-long semiannual exercise called Vigilant
Guardian. [Newhouse News, 1/25/02]
NORAD is thus fully staffed and alert, and senior officers are manning stations
throughout the US. The entire chain of command is in place and ready when the
first hijacking is reported. An article later says, “In retrospect, the
exercise would prove to be a serendipitous enabler of a rapid military response
to terrorist attacks on Sept. 11.” [Aviation Week and Space Technology,
6/3/02] ABC News later reports that because NORAD is “conducting
training exercises [it] therefore [has] extra fighter planes on alert.” [ABC News, 9/14/02] Colonel Robert Marr, in
charge of NEADS, says, “We had the fighters with a little more gas on board. A
few more weapons on board.” [ABC News, 9/11/02] The
exercise poses “an imaginary crisis to North American Air Defense outposts
nationwide.” [Newhouse News, 1/25/02]
Accounts by participants vary on if 9/11 was the second, third, or fourth day
of the exercise. [Newhouse News, 1/25/02, Ottawa Citizen, 9/11/02, Code One Magazine, 1/02]
6:30 a.m. September 11, 2001
|
|
“Approximately two hours prior to the first attack”, at
least two workers at the instant messaging company Odigo receive messages
warning of the WTC attack. This Israeli owned company has its headquarters
two blocks from the WTC. [Washington Post 9/28/01;
Ha'aretz 9/26/01]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A National Public Radio correspondent states: “I spoke with
Congressman Ike Skelton—a Democrat from Missouri and a member of the Armed
Services Committee—who said that just recently the director of the CIA
warned that there could be an attack—an imminent attack — on the United
States of this nature. So this is not entirely unexpected.” [NPR 9/11/01]
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) later announces
that they are investigating the trading of shares of 38 companies in the
days just before 9/11. The San Francisco Chronicle states that the New York
Stock Exchange sees “unusually heavy trading in airline and related stocks
several days before the attacks.” All of the 38 companies logically stood
to lose from the attacks. They include parent companies of major airlines
American, Continental, Delta, Northwest, Southwest, United and USAirways as
well as cruise lines Carnival and Royal Caribbean, aircraft maker Boeing
and defense contractor Lockheed Martin. The SEC is also looking into
suspicious short selling of numerous insurance company stocks. [AP 10/2/01; San Francisco Chronicle
10/3/01]
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a sharp increase in short selling of the stocks of
American and United airlines on the New York Stock Exchange prior to 9/11.
A short sell is a bet that a particular stock will drop. There is an
increase of 40 percent of short selling over the previous month for these
two airlines, compared to an 11 percent increase for other big airlines and
one percent for the exchange overall. A significant profit was to be made:
United stock dropped 43 percent and American dropped 39 percent the first
day the market reopened after the attack (see also September 6-10, 2001). Short selling of
Munich Re, the world's largest reinsurer, is also later noted by German
investigators. Inquiries into short selling millions of Munich Re shares
were made in France days before the attacks. [Reuters, 9/20/01, San Francisco Chronicle, 9/22/01]
Munich Re stock plummets after the attacks, as they claim the attacks will
cost them $2 billion. [Dow Jones Business News, 9/20/01]
There is also suspicious trading activity involving reinsurers Swiss
Reinsurance and AXA. These trades are especially curious because the
insurance sector “was one of the brightest spots in a very difficult
market” at this time. [Los Angeles Times, 9/19/01]
There is also a short spike on Dutch airline KLM stock three to seven days
before 9/11, reaching historically unprecedented levels. [USA Today, 9/26/01]
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
German central bank president Ernst Welteke says a study by
his bank indicates, “There are ever clearer signs that there were activities
on international financial markets that must have been carried out with the
necessary expert knowledge,” not only in shares of heavily affected
industries such as airlines and insurance companies, but also in gold and
oil. [Telegraph, 9/23/01]
His researchers have found “almost irrefutable proof of insider trading.” [Miami Herald, 9/24/01]
“If you look at movements in markets before and after the attack, it makes
your brow furrow. But it is extremely difficult to really verify it.”
Nevertheless, he believes that “in one or the other case it will be
possible to pinpoint the source.” [Fox News, 9/22/01] Welteke reports “a
fundamentally inexplicable rise” rise in oil prices before the attacks [Miami Herald, 9/24/01]
and then a further rise of 13% the day after the attacks. Gold rises
nonstop for days after the attacks. [Telegraph 9/23/01]
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerous other overseas investigations into insider trading
before 9/11 are later established. There are investigations in Belgium,
France, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Monte Carlo, Cyprus and other countries.
There are particularly strong suspicions British markets were manipulated.
Italy is investigating suspicious share movements on the day of the attack,
as well as the previous day. Japan as well is looking into trading of
futures contracts. [Fox News 9/22/01;
CNN 9/24/01; BBC 9/18/01]
The British conclude in a remarkable two weeks that their markets were not
manipulated (see October 16, 2001).
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 9/11 both the SEC and the Secret Service announce
probes into an unusually high volume trade of five-year US Treasury note
purchases around this time. These transactions included a single $5 billion
trade. The Wall Street Journal explains: “Five-year Treasury notes are
among the best investments in the event of a world crisis, especially one
that hits the US. The notes are prized for their safety and their backing
by the US government, and usually rally when investors flee riskier
investments, such as stocks.” The value of these notes has risen sharply
since the events of September 11. The article also points out that with
these notes, “tracks would be hard to spot.” [Wall Street Journal, 10/2/01]
|
|
|
|
Zim-American Israeli Shipping Co. moves their North
American headquarters from the 16th floor of the WTC to Norfolk,
Virginia, one week before the 9/11 attacks. The Israeli government owns
49 percent of the company. [Virginian-Pilot, 9/4/01]
Zim announced the move and its date six months earlier. [Virginian-Pilot, 4/3/01]
More than 200 workers had just been moved out; about 10 are still in
the building making final moving arrangements on 9/11, but escape
alive. [Jerusalem Post, 9/13/01,
Journal of Commerce, 10/18/01]
The move leaves only one Israeli company, ClearForest, with 18
employees, in the WTC on 9/11. The four or five employees in the
building at the time manage to escape. [Jerusalem Post, 9/13/01]
One year later, a Zim ship is impounded attempting to ship Israeli
military equipment to Iran; it is speculated that this is done with the
knowledge of Israel. [AFP, 8/29/02 (B)]
|
|
|
|
In a speech to the Department of
Defense, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld announces that the Department
of Defense “cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions.” CBS later
calculates that 25% of the yearly defense budget is unaccounte for, and quotes a long-time defense budget analyst: “[Their]
numbers are pie in the sky. The books are cooked routinely year
after year.” Coverage of this rather shocking story is nearly
nonexistent given the events of the next day. [Department of
Defense speech 9/10/01; CBS 1/29/02]
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Attorney General Ashcroft rejects
a proposed $58 million increase in financing for the bureau's
counter-terrorism programs. On the same day, he sends a request
for budget increases to the White House. It covers 68 programs,
but none of them relate to counter-terrorism. He also sends a
memorandum to his heads of departments, stating his seven
priorities—none of them relating to counter-terrorism. This is
more than a little strange, since Ashcroft stopped flying
public airplanes in July due to terrorist threats (see July 26, 2001) and he told a
Senate committee in May that counter-terrorism was his “highest
priority.” [New York Times,
6/1/02, Guardian, 5/21/02]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to CBS News, in the afternoon before the attack,
“alarm bells were sounding over unusual trading in the US stock options
market.” It has been documented that the CIA, the Mossad and many other
intelligence agencies monitor stock trading in real time using highly
advanced programs such as Promis. Both the FBI and the Justice Department
have confirmed the use of such programs for US intelligence gathering
through at least this summer. This would confirm that CIA should have had
additional advance warning of imminent attacks against American and
United Airlines planes. [CBS, 9/19/01] There
are even allegations that bin Laden was able to get a copy of Promis. [Fox News, 10/16/01] FTW
|
|
|
|
Warren Buffett, possibly the second richest man on
Earth [Salon, 8/31/99],
schedules a morning charity event inside Offutt Air Force Base in
Nebraska. A number of CEOs who would otherwise have been in the WTC
attend. Attendees had just arrived when the first WTC attack occurs.
This base is the center of the nation's military defenses, and the
same base that Bush will fly to later in the day. The timing,
probable attendance, and location of the meeting is curious, to say
the least, as is the total lack of any mention of the meeting
anywhere, except for one aside by a business leader (Anne Tatlock,
CEO and President of Fiduciary and Franklin)explaining why she
survived the WTC attack. [San Francisco
Business Times 2/1/02]
|
|
|
|
September 11, 2001
|
|
|
An advertisement for a “homeland
security” event in 2002 will mention the following curious
sentence: “On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr. [John]
Fulton and his team at the CIA were running a pre-planned
simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be
created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they
know that the scenario would come true in a dramatic way that
day.” [National Law
Enforcement Security Institute, 8/02] Fulton's team is
part of the National Reconnaissance Office, which “operates many
of the nation's spy satellites. It draws its personnel from the
military and the CIA.” The simulation was to start at 9:00 a.m.,
four miles from where one of the real hijacked planes took off.
The government calls the simulation just a “bizarre coincidence.”
[AP 8/21/02]
The government has repeatedly claimed that no one imagined a
plane deliberately crashing into a building (see May 16, 2002 (B)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elect McCaskill Elect
Bekki Cook Citizens for McCaskill
Missouri Democrat Party Missouri
Statesmanship Party
Media in
the 133rd District Pankey Campaign News
Pankey Bio Stop
Blunts Politics for Kids Youth
Watch
Issues Elect
Pankey 2004Blunts and Osama Stop Blunts Contact
This
site maintained by volunteers.
Neither Marvalene Pankey nor the Pankey campaign necessarily
approves of nor endorses any banners or popups that may appear on this
site. To eliminate pop ups on your
computer install free software from http://www.panicware.com/
|